Legal Opinion

In re Application of Ohio Power Co. (Slip Opinion)

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 2014No. 2013-0154PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, J.

Summary

{¶ 1} In the case below, the Public Utilities Commission authorized the Ohio Power Company to recover costs associated with providing transmission service to its standard-service-offer customers (those who take generation service from the incumbent distribution utility instead of buying it on the market). The cost of transmission service is set by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”). Under Ohio law, electric-distribution utilities are allowed to recover from their retail customers all transmission-related costs imposed on the utility by FERC or by an organization approved…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. HanningOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Utility Service Partners, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Constellation NewEnergy, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Monongahela Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. In Re Application Seeking Approval of Ohio Power Company's Proposal to Enter Into an Affiliate Power Purchase Agreement for Inclusion in the Power Purchase Agreement RiderOhio Supreme Court · 2018
  3. In re Application of Duke Energy Ohio, Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  4. In re Ohio Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. PowellOhio Court of Appeals · 2021

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API