Legal Opinion
Constellation NewEnergy, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 17, 2004No. 2003-2159PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
Background
{¶ 1} This is an appeal as of right by appellant, Constellation NewEnergy, Inc. (“Constellation”), from orders of the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (“PUCO”) in In re Continuation of Rate Freeze & Extension of Market Dev. *531Period for Dayton Power & Light Co., case No. 02-2779-EL-ATA, 2003 WL 22142843 (Sept. 2, 2003) (the “MDP extension case”). Dayton Power & Light Company (“DP & L”) was the applicant and Industrial Energy Users-Ohio (“IEU”) was an intervening party in the MDP extension case. Both DP & L and IEU have intervened as appellees in this appeal, as has Cincinnati Gas &…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- At&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Weiss v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- Ohio Edison Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Time Warner AxS v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Sunoco, Inc. (R & M) v. Toledo Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2011
- In re Application of Black Fork Wind Energy, L.L.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2013
- In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2011
- In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- Martin Marietta Magnesia Specialties, L.L.C. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2011
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.