Legal Opinion
State v. Hanning
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 7, 2000No. 99-437PublishedCited by 87 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.
Today we are asked to determine whether the complicity statute, R.C. 2923.03, applies to juvenile bindover criteria set forth in R.C. 2151.26. For the reasons that follow, we find that it does not and we therefore affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.
I. History of Juvenile Justice
The first juvenile court was established in Chicago, in 1899. Zierdt, The Little Engine that Arrived at the Wrong Station: How to Get Juvenile Justice Back on the Right Track (1999), 33 U.S.F.L.Rev. 401, 406-409. The juvenile justice system is grounded in the legal doctrine of parens patriae, meaning that the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State ex rel. Dispatch Printing Co. v. SoloveOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. ChapmanOhio Supreme Court · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- Hernandez v. KellyOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. BloomerOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Harris v. BornhorstCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- State v. IaconaOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. Aalim (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.