Legal Opinion

Monongahela Power Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 2004No. 2004-0305PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

Background

{¶ 1} This is an appeal as of right by Monongahela Power Company (“Mon Power”) from decisions of the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio in In the Matter of the Application of the Monongahela Power Co. for Approval of a Market-Based Standard Serv. Offer & Competitive Bidding Process (Oct. 22, 2003) case No. 03-1104-EL-ATA, 2003 WL 22472140 (the “MBSSO case”). Mon Power was the applicant, and Industrial Energy Users-Ohio (“IEU”) was an intervening party in the MBSSO case. IEU has also intervened as an appellee in this appeal.

{¶ 2} The legal backdrop for this appeal is Am.Sub.S.B. No.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. At&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Weiss v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  5. AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Sunoco, Inc. (R & M) v. Toledo Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Martin Marietta Magnesia Specialties, L.L.C. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Elyria Foundry Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Discount Cellular, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2007

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API