Legal Opinion

In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co. (Slip Opinion)

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 2016No. 2013-0521PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, J.

Summary

{¶ 1} This cause arises from the Public Utilities Commission’s (“PUCO’s”) modification and approval of the second electric-security plan of the American Electric Power operating companies, Ohio Power Company and Columbus Southern Power Company.1 The case below was a major proceeding in which the commission authorized new generation rates for the companies (collectively, “AEP”). Five parties appealed.2 AEP also filed a cross-appeal. In total, the remaining parties have raised eight propositions of law that challenge various elements of the commission’s orders (the original order and two…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Utility Service Partners, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Constellation NewEnergy, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Monongahela Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Ohio Edison Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In re Complaints of Lycourt-Donovan v. Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  2. In re Application of Alamo Solar I, L.L.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2023
  3. State ex rel. Swanson v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. In re Comm. Rev. of the Capacity Charges of Ohio Power Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  5. City of Toledo v. Corr. Comm'n of Nw. OhioOhio Court of Appeals · 2017

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API