In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co. (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, J.
Summary
{¶ 1} This cause arises from the Public Utilities Commission’s (“PUCO’s”) modification and approval of the second electric-security plan of the American Electric Power operating companies, Ohio Power Company and Columbus Southern Power Company.1 The case below was a major proceeding in which the commission authorized new generation rates for the companies (collectively, “AEP”). Five parties appealed.2 AEP also filed a cross-appeal. In total, the remaining parties have raised eight propositions of law that challenge various elements of the commission’s orders (the original order and two…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Utility Service Partners, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Constellation NewEnergy, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Monongahela Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Ohio Edison Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- In re Complaints of Lycourt-Donovan v. Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
- In re Application of Alamo Solar I, L.L.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2023
- State ex rel. Swanson v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
- In re Comm. Rev. of the Capacity Charges of Ohio Power Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- City of Toledo v. Corr. Comm'n of Nw. OhioOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.