In re Ohio Power Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, J.
I. Summary
{¶ 1} In the orders on appeal, appellee and cross-appellee, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (“PUCO” or “the commission”), approved a mechanism called a phase-in recovery rider (“PIRR”) for appellant and cross-appellee, Ohio Power Company, to recover fuel costs that were incurred under the company’s first electric-security plan (“ESP”) but were deferred for future collection. See In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co. & Ohio Power Co. for Approval of a Mechanism to Recover Deferred Fuel Costs Ordered Under R.C. 4928. 144, Pub. Util. Comm. Nos. 11-4920-EL-RDR and…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Grava v. Parkman TownshipOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Fort Frye Teachers Ass'n v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- O'Nesti v. DeBartolo Realty Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2007
- Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. Bethel (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
- Fleming v. SheltonOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Zarbana Indus., Inc. v. HayesOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- Berns Custom Homes, Inc. v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- State ex rel. Rarden v. Butler Cty. Common Pleas CourtOhio Supreme Court · 2023
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.