In re Application of Duke Energy Ohio, Inc. (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.
{¶ 1} Appellants, the Office of the Ohio Consumers’ Counsel, the Ohio Manufacturers’ Association, Ohio Partners for Affordable Energy, and the Kroger Company, appeal an order of the Public Utilities Commission that authorized intervening appellee Duke Energy Ohio, Inc., to recover costs associated with the environmental remediation of two manufactured-gas-plant (“MGP”) sites near downtown Cincinnati.
{¶ 2} Appellants raise five propositions of law, but we have already resolved proposition Nos. 4 and 5. Of the three that remain, none warrants reversal. Therefore, we affirm the commission’s…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- State ex rel. Burrows v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Constellation NewEnergy, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Monongahela Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Clark v. State Teachers Retirement Sys.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
- Norman v. Kellie Auto Sales, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
- In re Application of Suburban Natural Gas Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
- In re Establishing the Solar Generation Fund RiderOhio Supreme Court · 2022
- In re Application of Dayton Power & Light Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2025
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.