Legal Opinion

Utility Service Partners, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 2009No. 2008-1507PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCupp, J.

{¶ 1} Utility Service Partners, Inc. (“USP”) appeals from an order of the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio making Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc. (“Columbia”) responsible for the repair and replacement of hazardous natural gas service lines. USP alleges that the commission lacked statutory authority to issue the order and that the order lacked record support, substantially impaired the obligations of USP’s contracts, and resulted in an unconstitutional taking of property. None of USP’s arguments has merit, and we affirm.

I

{¶ 2} A service line is part of the pipeline system used to distribute…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. DIRECTV, Inc. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Mason City School District Board of Education v. Warren County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  5. RNG Properties, Ltd. v. Summit Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API