Legal Opinion
Rench v. Harris
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 17, 1946No. Civ. 13064PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHOTTKY, J. pro tem.
This is an appeal from an order changing the place of trial from the city and county of San Francisco to the county of Alameda.
The complaint alleged that defendants are the owners of certain real property located in San Francisco; that in June, 1944, plaintiff submitted a plan and scheme to defendant Joseph W. Harris whereby the rental from said real property would be substantially increased; that plaintiff and defendants then agreed that the plan, would be put into operation and that “plaintiff should have an interest in any leasehold rights thereafter obtained”; that a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Fong v. SternesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Chandler v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Neet v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Lyons v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Meadows v. Emett & ChandlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Crofts & Anderson v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Carnation Co. v. El Rey Cheese Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
- Gilman v. NordinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Hagan v. GilbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.