Legal Opinion
Crofts & Anderson v. Johnson
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 27, 1950No. Civ. 14407PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
Plaintiff appeals from an order granting a change of place of trial from Alameda County to Humboldt County.
Questions Presented(1) Is there evidence to support the court’s implied finding that the account was not stated in Alameda County; and (2) in passing on a motion for change of place of trial in an action on an account stated, may the court consider the original contract out of which the account was stated?
Facts
There are two causes of action in the complaint filed in Alameda County: (1) a book account for goods, wares and merchandise; and (2) an account stated. Defendant Johnson, at the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Goossen v. CliftonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Jones v. WiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Moon v. MoonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Parker Co., Inc. v. Exeter Refining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
- Baird v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Pacific Bal Industries v. Northern Timber, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Nanny v. Ruby Lighting Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1952
- Maselli v. EH Appleby & Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Erwin v. Cee-Tee Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
- INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT CO., INC. v. ChagnonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.