Legal Opinion
Gilman v. Nordin
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 22, 1952No. Civ. 15192PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
In an action brought in San Francisco, the court denied defendant’s motion for change of venue to Los Angeles, the county of defendant’s residence. Defendant appeals.
Questions Presented(1) Is an action for dissolution of a partnership and an accounting one founded on a contract within the meaning of section 395 of the Code of Civil Procedure? (2) Does that section apply where there is no showing in what county the contract was entered into?
Record
The complaint contains four counts. The first alleges an oral agreement between the parties to be performed in San Francisco forming a partnership…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Goossen v. CliftonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Peterson v. ShermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Postin v. GriggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Bybee v. FairchildCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Pacific Bal Industries v. Northern Timber, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Rudnick v. DelfinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Quick v. CorsaroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Johnson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Erwin v. Cee-Tee Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.