Legal Opinion
Meadows v. Emett & Chandler
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 19, 1950No. Civ. 14501PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
The appeal involves the question of venue. Plaintiff sued in the city and county of San Francisco for an alleged breach of contract to pay money. Defendants are all residents of the county of Los Angeles. They moved to change the place of trial to Los Angeles under sections 396b and 397, subdivision 1, of the Code of Civil Procedure. The defendants filed affidavits and amended affidavits in support of their *497motion. No counteraffidavits were filed. The appeal is taken from the order denying the motion to change the venue.
The complaint alleges that in 1939 plaintiff entered into a contract in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Erkenbrecher v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Hollywood Cleaning & Pressing Co. v. Hollywood Laundry Service, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1932
- Neet v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Sheeley v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Dos Pueblos Ranch & Improvement Co. v. EllisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Sonora Diamond Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Leek v. CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Auer v. FrankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Vasey v. California Dance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Nucal Foods, Inc. v. Quality Egg LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.