Neet v. Holmes
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SHENK, J. —
The plaintiffs sued the defendants for an accounting, for a declaration of trust of certain mining property, and other relief. The action was commenced in Los Angeles County which was the county of the defendants’ residence. Mining claims referred to in the complaint were situated in Imperial County. Certain of the defendants moved for a change of venue to Imperial County. The motions were denied and this appeal is prosecuted by the moving defendants from the orders denying their motions.
The appellants, who will be referred to as the defendants, assert that they are entitled to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Fong v. SternesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- State v. Royal Consolidated Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Vaughan v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Turlock Theatre Co. v. LawsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Peiser v. MettlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Goossen v. CliftonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Kaluzok v. BrissonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Myers v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Ward Manufacturing Co. v. MileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.