Legal Opinion
Carnation Co. v. El Rey Cheese Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 29, 1948No. Civ. 13863PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGoodell, J.
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion for change of place of trial.
Section 395, Code of Civil Procedure, provides that “. . . When a defendant has contracted to perform an obligation in a particular county, either the county where such obligation is to be performed, or in which the contract in fact was entered into, or the county in which the defendant, or any such defendant, resides . . . shall be a proper county for the trial of an action founded on such obligation, and the county in which such obligation is incurred shall be deemed to be the county in which it is to be performed…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Goossen v. CliftonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Kaluzok v. BrissonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Gordon v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Lakeshore Cattle Co. v. Modoc Land & Livestock Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Parker Co., Inc. v. Exeter Refining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United Professional Planning, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Chambreau v. CoughlanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Crofts & Anderson v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Turner v. SimpsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Enter v. CrutcherAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.