Garat v. City of Riverside
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TIMLIN, J.
In general, the matter before us has arisen within the context of an ongoing municipal land-use planning dispute between, on the one hand, the City of Riverside (a charter city under the authority of article XI, sections 3 and 5, of the California Constitution, with charter set forth at Statutes 1981, Appendix-Charters, pages 55-80), its City Council and various “controlled growth” special interest groups (hereinafter, unless otherwise specifically indicated, the City) and, on the other hand, various private citizens, other special interest groups and development consortiums…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Associated Home Builders of Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. ValentineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Lesher Communications, Inc. v. City of Walnut CreekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Citizens Ass'n for Sensible Development of Bishop Area v. County of InyoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Morehart v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- DeVita v. County of NapaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Napa Citizens for Honest Government v. Napa County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- San Francisco Tomorrow v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Cadiz Land Co., Inc. v. Rail Cycle, LPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.