Legal Opinion
Cadiz Land Co., Inc. v. Rail Cycle, LP
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 18, 2000No. E024373, E024532PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GAUT, J.
Appellant Cadiz Land Company, Inc. (Cadiz) 1 challenges under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) 2 the County of San Bernardino’s certification of an environmental impact report and related approval of Rail Cycle, L.P.’s proposed landfill project (landfill). 3 The proposed landfill site is located in the Mojave Desert region of San Bernardino County (County). Cadiz owns agricultural land within the near vicinity of the proposed landfill site, and asserts that the landfill will have significant adverse impacts on its agricultural operations and will contaminate the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Morehart v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- JKH Enterprises, Inc. v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- ASS'N OF IRRITATED RESIDENTS v. County of MaderaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- California Oak Foundation v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Eureka Citizens for Responsible Government v. City of EurekaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- North Coast Rivers Alliance v. Marin Municipal Water District Board of DirectorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.