Legal Opinion

DeVita v. County of Napa

California Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1995No. S037642PublishedCited by 178 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

In November of 1990, the voters of Napa County enacted Measure J, an initiative that amends the land-use element of the county’s general plan to preserve agricultural land. Measure J made the redesignation of existing agricultural land and open space essentially conditional on voter approval, with certain exceptions, until the year 2021. The questions before the court are whether a county’s general plan can be amended by an initiative of the county’s electorate acting pursuant to article II, section 11 of the California Constitution, and whether the electorate can properly…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Associated Home Builders of Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Selby Realty Co. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Woods v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by178 opinions

  1. I'On, L.L.C. v. Town of Mt. PleasantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Garcia v. McCutchenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Santa Clara County Local Transportation Authority v. GuardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. People v. MendozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Manduley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002

173 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API