Lesher Communications, Inc. v. City of Walnut Creek
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EAGLESON, J.
We are asked to decide whether an initiative measure limiting municipal growth which conflicts with a city’s general plan amends that plan, and, if it is not an amendment, whether it is invalid. As we explain below, we conclude that the initiative measure in dispute is not a general plan amendment, and that state law which requires that zoning ordinances conform to the general plan invalidates newly enacted zoning ordinances that do not conform to an existing general plan.
I
The Planning and Zoning Law of the State of California (Gov. Code, § 65000 et seq.)1 mandates the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Molien v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Associated Home Builders of Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Yost v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Hurst v. City of BurlingameCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by111 opinions
- People ex rel. Lungren v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- DeVita v. County of NapaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Kopp v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Professional Engineers in California Government v. KemptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.