San Francisco Tomorrow v. City & County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION†]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLINE, P. J.
INTRODUCTION
Appellants San Francisco Tomorrow and Parkmerced Action Coalition (PMAC) appeal the San Francisco Superior Court’s denial of appellants’ petition for writ of mandate seeking to overturn the decision by respondents City and County of San Francisco (City) and its board of supervisors (Board) approving the Parkmerced Development Project (the project). The project involves the long-term redevelopment of the privately owned, 152-acre Parkmerced property by real party in interest Parkmerced Investors Properties, LLC.
Appellants challenge the court’s denial of their…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Londoner v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Morehart v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Orange Citizens for Parks & Recreation v. Superior Court of Orange Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2016
- San Franciscans for Livable Neighborhoods v. City & Cnty. of S.F., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Covina Residents for Responsible Dev. v. City of Covina, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Highway 68 Coal. v. Cnty. of Monterey, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Hill v. City of S.F., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.