Morehart v. County of Santa Barbara
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LUCAS, C. J.
The Subdivision Map Act (Gov. Code, § 66410 et seq.) provides that contiguous parcels of land are not automatically merged by virtue of being held by the same owner. Such parcels “may be merged by local agencies only in accordance with the authority and procedures prescribed by this article” (id., §§ 66451.10-66451.21], which “providejs] the sole and exclusive authority for local agency initiated merger of contiguous parcels.” (Id., § 66451.10, subd. (b); all section references are to the Government Code unless otherwise indicated.)
Without following those statutory…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Olson v. CoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Fisher v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by230 opinions
- Griset v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Fladeboe v. American Isuzu Motors Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Sullivan v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
- Amwest Surety Insurance v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re Baycol Cases I & IICalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
225 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.