Legal Opinion
Citizens Ass'n for Sensible Development of Bishop Area v. County of Inyo
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 13, 1985No. Docket Nos. E001138, E001340PublishedCited by 104 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MORRIS, P. J.
Plaintiffs, Citizens Association for Sensible Development of Bishop Area, et al. (Citizens), appeal from judgments denying its petitions for injunctive relief and for a writ of mandate setting aside and vacating two actions of the Inyo County Board of Supervisors (Board or Board of Supervisors), to wit: (1) the December 6, 1983 action approving Bishop general plan amendments 83-10 and 83-11, zoning reclassification 83-23, and two negative declarations in support of these actions, and (2) the March 6, 1984 action approving tentative tract map 188, road abandonment 83.2,…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Johnson v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Woodland Hills Residents Ass'n v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by104 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- DeVita v. County of NapaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- County of Amador v. El Dorado County Water AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. City of BakersfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Gentry v. City of MurrietaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.