Legal Opinion

United States v. Kirk Koo Chow

United States Court of International Trade

Decided December 20, 1993No. Court No. 93-03-00139PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Carman, Judge:

Plaintiff commenced this action to recover civil penalties for violations of 19 U.S.C. § 1592 (1988) and to recover marking duties provided in 19 U.S.C. § 1304(f) (1988) pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1592(d). Defendant moves to dismiss the entire action pursuant to US-CIT Rule 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; to dismiss Count II of the complaint pursuant to USCIT Rule 12(b)(5) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; and to dismiss the complaint pursuant to USCIT Rules 9(b) and 12(b)(5) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Aircraft & Diesel Equipment Corp. v. HirschSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. Priority Products, Inc., and Walter L. And Rosalie E. HussCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  3. United States v. Thorson Chemical Corp.United States Court of International Trade · 1992
  4. United States v. F.A.G. Bearings Corp.United States Court of International Trade · 1984
  5. United States v. Thorson Chemical Corp.United States Court of International Trade · 1990

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. IslipUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
  2. United States v. Obron Atlantic Corp.United States Court of International Trade · 1994
  3. United States v. RicciUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
  4. Hontex Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
  5. United States v. UPS Customhouse Brokerage, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API