United States v. Obron Atlantic Corp.
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Carman, Judge:
Plaintiff commenced this action to recover civil pen-alities and collect customs duties for fraudulent, grossly negligent or negligent violations of 19 U.S.C. § 1592 (1988). Defendant has two motions before the Court. In the first motion, defendant moves to dismiss the amended complaint pursuant to USCIT Rules 5 and 12(b)(1). In its second motion, defendant moves to dismiss Count I of the amended complaint pursuant to USCIT Rules 9(b) and 12(b)(5), and in the alternative, requests the Court to require plaintiff to provide a more definite statement of the facts which…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Jac Natori Co.United States Court of International Trade · 1993
- United States v. Kirk Koo ChowUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
- United States v. F.A.G. Bearings Corp.United States Court of International Trade · 1984
- United States v. Modes, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 1989
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. IslipUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- United States v. RicciUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- United States v. Inn Foods, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2007
- United States v. Complex MacHine Works Co.United States Court of International Trade · 1996
- United States v. International Trading Services, LLCUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.