Legal Opinion
United States v. F.A.G. Bearings Corp.
United States Court of International Trade
Decided October 4, 1984No. 83-9-01314PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CARMAN, Judge:
In this action where plaintiff seeks to recover lost duties as well as penalties for false descriptions of imported merchandise, defendant moves to dismiss the second amended complaint pursuant to Rules 8(a), 9(b) and 12(b)(5) of the Rules of the United States Court of International Trade, for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 1 Defendant urges as follows: (1) count I of the second amended complaint fails to state the circumstances allegedly constituting fraud with the particularity required by rule 9(b); (2) counts II through…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- One Lot Emerald Cut Stones and One Ring v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,853 John Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,590 David Segal v. Lawrence Gordon, and Coburn Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Denny v. BarberCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Kathleen McGinty v. Beranger Volkswagen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. IslipUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- United States v. Daewoo International (America) Corp.United States Court of International Trade · 1988
- United States v. Kirk Koo ChowUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
- United States v. Modes, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 1992
- United States v. Obron Atlantic Corp.United States Court of International Trade · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.