Legal Opinion

Aircraft & Diesel Equipment Corp. v. Hirsch

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 16, 1947No. 95PublishedCited by 398 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rutledge

This case is the fourth in a series seeking here a determination of the invalidity, on constitutional grounds, of the First and Second Renegotiation Acts 1 and allied legislation.

In Coffman v. Breeze Corporations, 323 U. S. 316, and in Alma Motor Co. v. Timken-Detroit Axle Co., 329 U. S. 129, the Royalty Adjustment Act 2 was attacked. The Alma Motor case was remanded to the Circuit Court of Appeals for a determination of the Act’s applicability. The suit in the Coffman case was by a patent owner to restrain his licensees from paying accrued royalties to the Government pursuant to the Act’s…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  5. Dobson v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by398 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Renegotiation Board v. Bannercraft Clothing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Lichter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. United States v. Clintwood Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Public Util. Comm'n of Cal. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

393 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API