Aircraft & Diesel Equipment Corp. v. Hirsch
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rutledge
This case is the fourth in a series seeking here a determination of the invalidity, on constitutional grounds, of the First and Second Renegotiation Acts 1 and allied legislation.
In Coffman v. Breeze Corporations, 323 U. S. 316, and in Alma Motor Co. v. Timken-Detroit Axle Co., 329 U. S. 129, the Royalty Adjustment Act 2 was attacked. The Alma Motor case was remanded to the Circuit Court of Appeals for a determination of the Act’s applicability. The suit in the Coffman case was by a patent owner to restrain his licensees from paying accrued royalties to the Government pursuant to the Act’s…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Dobson v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by398 opinions
- McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Renegotiation Board v. Bannercraft Clothing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Lichter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. Clintwood Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Public Util. Comm'n of Cal. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
393 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.