Legal Opinion
United States v. Islip
United States Court of International Trade
Decided August 26, 1998No. Slip Op. 98-125. Court No. 97-02-00357PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLACH, Judge.
I
SUMMARY
The United States Customs Service (“Customs”) commenced this action on February 28, 1997, against Gerald Brown (“Brown”) and others to recover civil penalties for violation of section 592 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1592 (1988), alleging fraudulent, grossly negligent, and negligent conduct concerning exportation of strainers, pump connectors, and check valves from Canada into the United States. This matter is before the Court on Defendant Brown’s Motion to Quash Service of Process and Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, Failure to…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Dimensional Communications, Inc. v. Oz Optics Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- Norsk Hydro Canada Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- Nereida Trading Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
- United States v. Am. Cas. Co. of Reading, Pa.United States Court of International Trade · 2015
- Ford Motor Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.