Legal Opinion

United States v. Priority Products, Inc., and Walter L. And Rosalie E. Huss

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided June 16, 1986No. Appeal 86-735PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWYGERT, Senior Circuit Judge.

The issue presented in this case is whether the United States Customs Service’s failure to name corporate officers in their individual capacities in written administrative pre-penalty and penalty notices issued pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1592(b) (1982) precludes suit against them in the Court of International Trade to recover a penalty originally assessed only against the corporation. The trial judge held that it did not, and we affirm.

OPINION

I

On October 1, 1982, pursuant to section 1592(b), the Portland, Oregon District Director of the United States Customs Service…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Aircraft & Diesel Equipment Corp. v. HirschSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Nickey v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Sims v. SchweikerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Appeal of H.R.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Allied-General Nuclear Services, Allied Chemical Nuclear Products, Inc. And Valley Pines Associates v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  3. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
  4. United States v. IslipUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
  5. NTN Bearing Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API