United States v. Priority Products, Inc., and Walter L. And Rosalie E. Huss
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SWYGERT, Senior Circuit Judge.
The issue presented in this case is whether the United States Customs Service’s failure to name corporate officers in their individual capacities in written administrative pre-penalty and penalty notices issued pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1592(b) (1982) precludes suit against them in the Court of International Trade to recover a penalty originally assessed only against the corporation. The trial judge held that it did not, and we affirm.
OPINION
I
On October 1, 1982, pursuant to section 1592(b), the Portland, Oregon District Director of the United States Customs Service…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Aircraft & Diesel Equipment Corp. v. HirschSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Nickey v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Sims v. SchweikerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
3Cited by51 opinions
- Appeal of H.R.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Allied-General Nuclear Services, Allied Chemical Nuclear Products, Inc. And Valley Pines Associates v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- United States v. IslipUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- NTN Bearing Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.