Legal Opinion
United States v. Ricci
United States Court of International Trade
Decided October 28, 1997No. Slip Op. 97-145; Court No. 95-09-01168PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLACH, Judge.
The United States seeks to recover an unpaid penalty of $30,000 from Eugene F. Ricci1 based on a Customs Service audit of Ricci’s records that found 169 entries for which he had faded to file an entry summary and/or pay duties timely, and a pattern of paying between 20 and 45 days late.
On April 3, 1992, Customs transmitted a prepenalty notice to Ricci, to which he responded. Customs notified Ricci that his response had not established an adequate reason to cancel the penalty in a letter dated February 9, 1993. On October 11, 1994, Customs rejected Ricci’s request for…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik Ag v. Murata MacHinery Ltd., and Murata of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Avia Group International, Inc., (Formerly Pensa, Inc.) v. L.A. Gear California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- United States v. StarrettCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. UPS Customhouse Brokerage, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2006
- United States v. UPS Customhouse Brokerage, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2010
- Byung Wu Lee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- United States v. SantosUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
- United States v. PuentesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.