Legal Opinion

Garibay v. Hemmat

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 1, 2008No. B194919PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KITCHING, J.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs Alejandra Garibay (Garibay) and Toby C. Barron, Jr., appeal from a judgment entered after the trial court granted summary judgment on plaintiffs’ claim for medical malpractice arising from surgery performed on Garibay by defendant Mehdi Hemmat, M.D. (Dr. Hemmat). Defendant’s summary judgment motion relied solely on the opinion of a medical expert witness that Dr. Hemmat did not commit medical malpractice. The medical expert witness based his opinion on facts derived from his review of hospital and medical records. These records were not properly…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. GardeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400California Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Whitfield v. RothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Tresemer v. BarkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. People v. DeanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Davis v. NadrichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Shugart v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Drexler v. PetersenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. People v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API