People v. Baker
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McKINSTER, Acting P. J.
—Defendant and appellant Lennett Baker appeals a judgment pursuant to Penal Code section 2962, finding that she qualifies as a mentally disordered offender.1 She contends that there was insufficient evidence to support the trial court’s finding because the prosecution relied on inadmissible hearsay in the guise of expert opinion testimony and that the testimony in some respects exceeded the scope of the expert witness’s expertise.
*1238Although we agree that some of the expert witness’s testimony was incompetent hearsay and that some of her testimony exceeded the scope…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. GardeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. GuitonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. S.M.California Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. ConnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. CavittCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- People v. LoweCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- People v. Aguilar CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2020
- People v. Ramirez CA1/4California Court of Appeal · 2014
- People v. Saran CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.