Legal Opinion

Whitfield v. Roth

California Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1974No. S.F. 23020PublishedCited by 110 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SULLIVAN, J.

In this action for damages for medical malpractice, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of nonsuit entered in favor of defendant County of Contra Costa (County) and Glenn S. Skinner, M.D., and from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of all the then remaining defendants. We discuss the appeals separately.

I

Appeal from Judgment of Nonsuit

Viewing the evidence under the well-settled rules governing nonsuits, 1 we set forth the following pertinent facts.

In November 1961, shortly after moving from Oregon and enrolling in the Oakland public schools, plaintiff Mary…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Tammen v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Horn v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Tingley v. Times Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Williams v. Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by110 opinions

  1. People v. GardeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Shirk v. Vista Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. People v. MontielCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Maughan v. SW Servicing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985

105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API