Legal Opinion

Shugart v. Regents of University of California

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 9, 2011No. B226338PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRIMES, J.

Plaintiffs Christine and Michael Shugart appeal from the entry of summary judgments in favor of defendants Linda Warren, M.D., and The Regents of the University of California (Regents). We conclude the trial court correctly entered judgment in favor of the Regents because plaintiffs’ opposition papers failed to raise a triable issue of fact, and we therefore affirm as to the Regents. However, we reverse the summary judgment in favor of Dr. Warren, finding plaintiffs’ expert declaration was admissible and raised triable issues as to Dr. Warren’s alleged medical negligence.

FACTS

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. AARTS Productions, Inc. v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Jennings v. Palomar Pomerado Health Systems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. 580 Folsom Associates v. Prometheus Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. Powell v. KleinmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. North 7th Street Associates v. ConstanteAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2016
  2. YDM Mgmt. Co. v. Sharp Cmty. Med. Grp., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  3. San Pasqual Band of Mission Indians v. State of California CA2/8California Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Carranza v. Holdman CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. Howard Entertainment, Inc. v. KudrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API