Legal Opinion
Tresemer v. Barke
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 22, 1978No. Civ. 52298PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STEPHENS, Acting P. J.
This is an appeal by plaintiff Donna Sue Tresemer from the grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant Morton Barke, M.D. The action, filed on April 12, 1976, is for damages allegedly sustained by plaintiff from a Daikon Shield intrauterine device. Plaintiff’s third amended complaint charges Dr. Barke, who inserted the device in August 1972, with willful misconduct (count one) and medical malpractice (count two). Mario De Lara, M.D., who attempted to remove the device on April 17, 1975, 1 is charged with willful misconduct (count three) and medical negligence…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Weirum v. RKO General, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1975
- Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- AARTS Productions, Inc. v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Black v. LittlejohnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Miller v. National Broadcasting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- Miller v. Bechtel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1983
- Hedlund v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.