People v. Dean
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KING, J.
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendant Jeffrey Farrar Dean appeals from a judgment and order committing him to the State Department of Mental Health as a sexually violent predator (SVP).
Defendant contends: (1) the trial court erroneously permitted plaintiff’s experts to testify to inadmissible hearsay; (2) as implemented in Riverside County, the appointment of only one expert for defendant violated his due process rights; and (3) his recommitment is illegal in that the protocols relied upon by plaintiff’s experts had not been adopted as administrative regulations. We affirm the judgment and…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. EwoldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. GardeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Hubbart v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. MontielCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- People v. HarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- People v. StampsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- People v. SelivanovCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- People v. RoaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- People v. Yates, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.