Legal Opinion

Davis v. Nadrich

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 27, 2009No. B202868PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ALDRICH, J.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff and appellant Joseph Daniel Davis (Davis), an attorney, was a partner in a law firm with John C. Heubeck. On appeal, Davis claims that defendant' and respondent Jeff Ira Nadrich interfered with the Davis/Heubeck partnership agreement by referring cases to Heubeck, personally. Davis appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of Nadrich and in favor of defendants and respondents Randal Neal Cohen (Cohen) and the law firm of Nadrich & Cohen, LLP. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

1. Facts.

Davis’s law practice primarily focused on asbestos…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400California Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Quelimane Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1998
  5. LiMandri v. JudkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Yelp Inc. v. CatronDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
  2. Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Stmicroelectronics, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
  3. Walters v. Fidelity Mortgage of California, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2010
  4. Duste v. Chevron Products Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
  5. Oakley, Inc. v. Nike, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2013

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API