Davis v. Nadrich
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ALDRICH, J.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff and appellant Joseph Daniel Davis (Davis), an attorney, was a partner in a law firm with John C. Heubeck. On appeal, Davis claims that defendant' and respondent Jeff Ira Nadrich interfered with the Davis/Heubeck partnership agreement by referring cases to Heubeck, personally. Davis appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of Nadrich and in favor of defendants and respondents Randal Neal Cohen (Cohen) and the law firm of Nadrich & Cohen, LLP. We affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
1. Facts.
Davis’s law practice primarily focused on asbestos…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
- Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400California Supreme Court · 2001
- Quelimane Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1998
- LiMandri v. JudkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Yelp Inc. v. CatronDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Stmicroelectronics, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Walters v. Fidelity Mortgage of California, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2010
- Duste v. Chevron Products Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
- Oakley, Inc. v. Nike, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2013
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.