Legal Opinion

Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 2001No. S086738PublishedCited by 1,657 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

We granted review in this cause to clarify the law that courts must apply in ruling on motions for summary judgment, both in actions generally and specifically in antitrust actions for unlawful conspiracy.

I

This is an antitrust action arising from a complaint filed by Theresa Aguilar on behalf of herself and all of the other, by her estimate, 24 million retail consumers of California Air Resources Board, or CARB, gasoline —collectively, Aguilar—against Atlantic Richfield Company, Chevron Corporation, Exxon Corporation, Mobil Oil Corporation, Union Oil Company of California…

2Cases cited81 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,657 opinions

  1. Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Hughes v. PairCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Zelig v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Reid v. Google, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2010

1,652 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API