Legal Opinion
State v. Carter
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 13, 2010No. AC 30281PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The pro se defendant, Anthony Carter, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Practice Book § 43-22. He challenges the propriety of that determination in light of his allegation that the court, in sentencing him, relied on inaccurate information. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The defendant’s prosecution arose from “the terrible consequences of a drug turf war,” in which a stray bullet fired from the defendant’s gun struck and seriously injured a seven year old girl. State v. Carter, 84 Conn. App. 263,…
3Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. McNellisConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. LeonardConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by10 opinions
- Carter v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- State v. BrownConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- State v. PetitpasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- State v. CarterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Langley v. LangleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.