Legal Opinion
State v. Lawrence
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 30, 2007No. SC 17598PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EATZ, J.
The defendant, Tarrance Lawrence, appeals, following our grant of certification, 1 from the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming the judgment of the trial court dismissing his motion to correct an illegal sentence, filed pursuant to Practice Book § 43-22, 2 based on the Appellate Court’s determination that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to consider the motion. State v. Lawrence, 91 Conn. App. 765, 766-67, 882 A.2d 689 (2005). The issue before us is whether § 43-22 is an appropriate procedural vehicle by which to challenge an allegedly improper conviction or whether,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- State v. ChicanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Kohlfuss v. Warden of Connecticut State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Cobham v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- State v. ReidSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Crawford v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Hummel v. Marten Transports, Ltd.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. CasianoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.