Legal Opinion
State v. Parker
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 27, 2010No. SC 18432PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly dismissed the motion of the defendant, Edward Parker, seeking to correct his sentence, which he claimed had been imposed in an illegal manner because: (1) he had not been given an opportunity to review the presentence investigation report (presentence report), thereby denying him an opportunity to address inaccuracies and mistakes in the report; and (2) he had been deprived of his constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel because his attorney failed to review the presentence report with him and…
2Cases cited81 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- State v. DelgadoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- Gould v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- State v. FrancisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- In Re Matthew F.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.