Carter v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
The petitioner, Anthony Carter, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court dismissing his fourth petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner claims that the court improperly concluded that, pursuant to Practice Book § 23-29, 1 his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel at sentencing and insufficiency of evidence are successive and barred by the doctrine of res judicata. 2 We reverse in part, and affirm in part, the judgment of the habeas court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to the petitioner’s appeal. In 2002, after a jury trial, the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Johnson v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- James L. v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Diaz v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Langston v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Anderson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- Sanchez v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
- Parker v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Tatum v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.