Legal Opinion
State v. Brown
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 17, 2012No. AC 32597PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ESPINOSA, J.
The defendant, Ronald Brown, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence. The defendant claims that the court’s ruling was improper because the court, at the time of sentencing, exceeded its authority by imposing a total effective sentence that included a sixteen year term of special parole. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The following undisputed facts are relevant to the present appeal. In 2005, the state charged the defendant under docket number CR-05-0109070 with possession of narcotics with intent to sell in…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. MirandaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- United States v. James R. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- State v. TruppiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. CrumpConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- State v. MirandaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- State v. KokkinakosConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- State v. Gang JinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- State v. BrownConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.