State v. Carter
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
These consolidated appeals arise from the judgments of the trial court denying the petitions for a writ of error coram nobis filed by the self-represented petitioner, Anthony Carter. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the trial court erred by denying his petitions for a writ of error coram nobis (1) in the absence of a written “objection” from the respondent, the state of Connecticut, and (2) by applying a three year limitation period. We conclude that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the petitions and therefore should have rendered judgments dismissing them.
*158Th…
3Cases cited15 opinions
- Telesco v. TelescoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State v. CareySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. DasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Jeffery v. FitchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1879
- State v. BurneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- State v. SimpsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- State v. WilliamsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015