Legal Opinion

State v. Carter

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 23, 2013No. AC 34414; AC 34487PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

These consolidated appeals arise from the judgments of the trial court denying the petitions for a writ of error coram nobis filed by the self-represented petitioner, Anthony Carter. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the trial court erred by denying his petitions for a writ of error coram nobis (1) in the absence of a written “objection” from the respondent, the state of Connecticut, and (2) by applying a three year limitation period. We conclude that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the petitions and therefore should have rendered judgments dismissing them.

*158Th…

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Telesco v. TelescoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. State v. CareySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  3. State v. DasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  4. Jeffery v. FitchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1879
  5. State v. BurneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. SimpsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
  2. State v. WilliamsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API