State v. Petitpas
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtMihalakos, J.
The defendant, Chad Petitpas, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence under Practice Book § 43-22. On appeal, the defendant claims that the sentencing court materially relied on inaccurate information pertaining to his age and criminal record. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The defendant's conviction was the subject of a direct appeal before our Supreme Court. See State v. Petitpas , 299 Conn. 99 , 6 A.3d 1159 (2010). In affirming the defendant's conviction, our Supreme Court concluded that the jury…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- HPT v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- State v. CarterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- State v. Antwon W.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- State v. PetitpasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. BozelkoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. FrancisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- Petitpas v. MartinDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
- State v. PetitpasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018