Legal Opinion
Neal v. Department of Corrections
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided September 10, 1998No. Docket 198616PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, P.J.
This is a class-action suit brought, in relevant part, under the Civil Rights Act, MCL 37.2101 et seq.; MSA 3.548(101) et seq., by female prisoners housed in facilities operated by the Michigan Department of Corrections (MDOC). Defendants are the department, its director, and several mdoc wardens, deputy wardens, and corrections officers. Defendants appeal by leave granted from a circuit court order denying their motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(4), (7), and (8). We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
The case arises out of allegations that male corrections…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Whitley v. AlbersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Neal v. CORRECTIONS DEPT.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Doe v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
- John Does 11-18 v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- Doe v. MICHIGAN DEPT. OF CORRECTIONSMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Neal v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.