Legal Opinion
Doe v. Department of Corrections
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided March 19, 2002No. Docket 200810PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON REMAND
Before: HOEKSTRA, P.J., and DOCTOROFF, MURPHY, Markey, Smolenski, Whitbeck, and Talbot, JJ.1 *52Per Curiam.
In our previous opinion,2 the majority of a special panel of this Court resolved the conflict between Neal v Dep’t of Corrections (On Rehearing) (Neal II)3 and Doe v Dep’t of Corrections4 by holding that the reasoning in Neal II was consistent with established rules of statutory construction. Defendant Michigan Department of Corrections appealed to the Michigan Supreme Court. In lieu of granting the department’s application for leave to appeal, the Court remanded the case to this…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. YeskeySupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- In Re Certified QuestionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Frank W Lynch & Co v. Flex Technologies, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
- Rookledge v. GarwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Davis v. State Employees' Retirement BoardMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
- Perlin v. Time Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
- Buntea v. State Farm Mutual Auto InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2006
- Moeller v. American Media, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
- Boelter v. Advance Magazine Publishers Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.