Legal Opinion
Neal v. CORRECTIONS DEPT.
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided November 24, 1998No. 198616PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
592 N.W.2d 370 (1998)
Tracy NEAL, Helen Gibbs, Stacy Barker, Ikemia Russell, Berth Clark, Linda Nunn, and Jane Doe, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Director of Michigan Department of Corrections, Joan Yukins, Sally Langley, Carol Howes, Robert Salis, Cornell Howard, Officer Portman, and Officer Robey, Defendants-Appellants (On Rehearing), and
Officer Tate, Officer Ellison, and Officer Gallagher, Defendants.
Docket No. 198616.
Court of Appeals of Michigan.
Submitted September 4, 1997, at Grand Rapids.
Decided June…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. YeskeySupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Jackson v. BishopCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Green v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
- Reed v. Michigan Metro Girl Scout CouncilMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
- Empire Iron Mining Partnership v. OrhanenMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- People v. WatsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
- Dept. of Corrections v. Human Rights CommissionSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
- Doe v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- Doe v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
- Doe v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.