Legal Opinion

Hudson v. Palmer

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided July 3, 1984No. 82-1630PublishedCited by 7,529 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Burger

We granted certiorari in No. 82-1630 to decide whether a prison inmate has a reasonable expectation of privacy in his prison cell entitling him to the protection of the Fourth Amendment against unreasonable searches and seizures. We also granted certiorari in No. 82-6695, the cross-petition, to determine whether our decision in Parratt v. Taylor, 451 U. S. 527 (1981), which held that a negligent deprivation of property by state officials does not violate the Fourteenth Amendment if an adequate postdeprivation state remedy exists, should extend to intentional deprivations of property.

I

The…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7,529 opinions

  1. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Whitley v. AlbersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

7,524 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API