Legal Opinion
John Does 11-18 v. Department of Corrections
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided March 27, 2018No. 332536; 335440; 335527PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtK.F. Kelly, J.
*483 Defendants appeal by right and by leave from three separate rulings of the trial court. First, defendants claim that the trial court erred when it declared unconstitutional an exclusion prohibiting individuals who are serving a sentence of imprisonment from bringing actions under the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act (ELCRA), MCL 37.2101 et seq . Next, defendants argue that the trial court erred when it ruled that the exclusion does not apply to trainees under the Holmes Youthful Trainee Act (HYTA), MCL 762.11 et seq ., because those individuals are not serving a sentence of imprisonment.…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Apostolos Paul Margaris v. Genesee CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- Jane Doe v. Department of TransportationMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- Ball v. PerkinsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
- Brock v. Michigan State UniversityDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2022
- Does 11-18 v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.