Legal Opinion

Neal v. Department of Corrections

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 7, 2012No. Docket Nos. 305142, 305186, 305195, 305225, 305226, and 305288PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSawyer, J.

In these consolidated cases, intervenors appeal by leave granted the trial court order1 denying their discovery requests to learn the identities of the plaintiff class. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

The underlying class actions in this case were brought by women convicted of felonies and incarcerated at facilities operated by the Department of Corrections (DOC). Plaintiffs filed these actions against the DOC, past and current directors and various wardens, as well as corrections officers. Plaintiffs alleged that they were the victims of systematic sexual harassment, sexual…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wilkie v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Tobin v. Providence HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. People v. SwaffordMichigan Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Miller v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Neal v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Deep Harbor Condominium Association v. Marine Adventure LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API