Doe v. MICHIGAN DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
601 N.W.2d 696 (1999)
Jane DOE and Joan Roe, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee.
Docket No. 200810.
Court of Appeals of Michigan.
Released June 25, 1999, at 10:00 a.m.
Vacated July 9, 1999.
Released for Publication October 8, 1999.
Before RICHARD ALLEN GRIFFIN, P.J., and McDONALD and WHITE, JJ.
ORDER
Doe v. Dep't of Corrections, Docket No. 200810. The Court orders that a special panel shall be convened pursuant to MCR 7.215(H) to resolve the conflict between this case and Neal v. Dep't of Corrections…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. YeskeySupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Roger Monette and Doris Monette v. Electronic Data Systems CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Fletcher Casey, Jr., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Samuel A. Lewis, Director, Arizona Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Key v. GraysonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
- Doe v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- Doe v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
- Doe v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- Doe v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.